The determination of carrying value is influenced by several factors that can significantly alter the financial portrayal of an asset. One of the primary factors is depreciation, which systematically reduces the value of tangible assets over time. Depreciation methods, such as straight-line or declining balance, can vary, impacting how quickly an asset’s carrying value diminishes. For instance, a company using an accelerated depreciation method will see a faster reduction in carrying value compared to one using a straight-line approach. In the realm of finance and accounting, the concepts of market value and carrying value are fundamental, yet they often lead to confusion due to their nuanced differences.
To illustrate these points, consider a technology company that has developed a popular software platform. The development costs are capitalized and amortized over the expected life of the software. However, if the software continues to generate significant revenue well beyond this period, its carrying value on the balance sheet may be much lower than its actual value to the company. Similarly, a real estate company might own property that has appreciated in value due to market changes, but this increase would not be captured in the carrying value unless the property is revalued. In other words, the market may not believe the company is worth the value on its books or that there are enough future earnings. Value investors might look for a company where the market value is less than its book value hoping that the market is wrong in its valuation.
This requirement aims to enhance the relevance and comparability of financial statements, offering stakeholders a more realistic view of an entity’s financial position. However, the reliance on market-based valuations can introduce volatility into financial statements, as fair values can swing with market conditions. The choice of accounting standard and value measurement method can have profound implications for how a company’s financial health is perceived. Investors, analysts, and other stakeholders must understand these nuances to make informed decisions.
In addition to using the term to refer to the worth of specific assets as listed on the balance sheet, the term is also used to refer to the net worth of a company. Carrying value is the reported cost of assets in the company’s balance sheet, wherein its value is calculated as the original cost less than the accumulated depreciation/impairments. The intangible asset is calculated as the actual cost less the amortization expense/impairments. Carrying value is an accounting measure of value in which the value of an asset or company is based on the figures in the respective company’s balance sheet.
However, the determination of the market value of illiquid assets is a challenging process. By examining these points, one can appreciate the complexity and significance of carrying value in financial reporting and investment analysis. Market value has to do with the current price that the asset would bring on the open market.
For example, a telecommunications company might use historical cost for its cable networks, depreciation for its equipment, and fair value adjustments for its investments in marketable securities. The interplay of these methods adds complexity to the measurement of carrying value and requires expertise to ensure accuracy and compliance with accounting standards. The method and period over which an intangible asset is amortized can affect its carrying value. For example, a company may choose to amortize a patent over a shorter period if it anticipates rapid technological advancements that could render the patent obsolete sooner. This strategic decision directly influences the carrying value recorded on the balance sheet.
However, this book value can often diverge significantly from the market value, which is the price that could be obtained on the open market. This discrepancy can lead to a complex dance between accounting principles and market reality, one that requires a nuanced understanding to navigate effectively. Analyzing carrying value involves a multifaceted approach that goes beyond merely looking at the numbers on a balance sheet. For instance, a company in a rapidly evolving tech industry might frequently reassess the carrying value of its equipment and patents to ensure they reflect current technological advancements and market demands.
Let’s say the machinery has an asset lifetime of 20 years and a yearly depreciation value of $25,000. For derivative securities such as futures and options, investors look at the underlying assets to calculate value and assess risk. This is one of the most essential questions in investing, and one that fundamental analysts and value investors aim to answer by analyzing information such as company financials. Discover the essentials of carrying value in financial reporting and analysis, including key factors and comparisons with fair value.
This is where fair value accounting comes into play, attempting to bridge the gap by providing a snapshot of an asset’s current worth based on market prices. Understanding the role of market conditions in determining carrying value is crucial for a comprehensive analysis of a company’s financial statements. It allows stakeholders to make informed decisions by considering not just the numbers on the balance sheet, but also the economic realities that those numbers represent.
The key is to recognize that both values offer unique insights and to use them in tandem to achieve investment objectives. Impairment testing is not just a technical exercise; it has real implications for a company’s financial health and investor perceptions. It requires careful consideration of market trends, future cash flows, and the interplay between carrying value and market value. By diligently applying impairment tests, companies can provide a more accurate picture of their financial position, ensuring transparency and trust with stakeholders.
If a new law significantly reduces the price that can be charged for the medication, the future cash flows from the patent could fall below its carrying value, triggering an impairment. Accounting practice states that original cost is used to record assets on the balance sheet, rather than market value, because the original cost can be traced to a purchase document, such as a receipt. At the initial acquisition of an asset, the carrying value of that asset is the original cost of its purchase. For example, a company may subject a fixed asset to an accelerated rate of depreciation, which rapidly reduces its carrying value. However, the market value of the asset is much higher, since market participants believe that the asset carries value better over the long term than would be reflected by the use of an accelerated depreciation method.
For physical assets, such as machinery or computer hardware, carrying cost is calculated as (original cost – accumulated depreciation). If a company purchases a patent or some other intellectual property item, then the formula for carrying value is (original cost – amortization expense). Carrying value is the amount at which an asset is recorded on the balance sheet of a business. It is typically defined as the original cost of an asset, less the accumulated amount of any depreciation or amortization, less the accumulated amount of any asset impairments.
Moreover, carrying value plays a crucial role in financial ratios and performance metrics. Ratios such as return on assets (ROA) and asset turnover rely on accurate carrying values to provide meaningful insights into a company’s operational efficiency and profitability. An overstated or understated carrying value can distort these ratios, leading to misguided conclusions about the company’s performance. Therefore, maintaining accurate carrying values is essential for reliable financial analysis. The role of carrying value extends beyond mere compliance with accounting standards; it also influences strategic business decisions. For instance, management may rely on carrying values to assess the need for asset replacement or to evaluate the potential return on investment for new acquisitions.
This figure provides investors and analysts with a baseline understanding of what the company’s assets are worth according to accounting standards. However, it’s important to note that carrying value may not always reflect the current fair market value of those assets, especially if they have appreciated or depreciated in value since their acquisition. In the realm of finance and accounting, the concepts of fair value and market value are often discussed in tandem, yet they hold distinct meanings and implications. Fair value is a measure of an asset’s worth that is derived from current market conditions, reflecting the price at which an informed and willing buyer and seller can agree upon in an arm’s length transaction. It is a theoretical valuation that takes into account factors such as future cash flows, present value calculations, and the time value of money.
This value fluctuates based on a variety of factors including interest rate changes, credit rating updates, and overall market demand. On the other hand, the carrying value is the original investment amount adjusted for amortization of any discounts or premiums over the life of the bond. From an investor’s point of view, these adjustments are crucial for making informed decisions. A company that regularly adjusts its carrying values to reflect fair market conditions is seen as more transparent and trustworthy.
This dynamic nature of fair value provides a more immediate snapshot of an asset’s worth, compared to the more static carrying value. The fair value of an asset is usually determined by the market and agreed upon by a willing buyer and seller and it can fluctuate often. In other words, the carrying value generally reflects equity, while carrying value vs market value the fair value reflects the current market price. When an asset is initially acquired, its carrying value is the original cost of its purchase.
Posted: September 11, 2023 5:46 pm
The issue of taksu is also one of honesty, for the artist and the viewer. An artist will follow his heart or instinct, and will not care what other people think. A painting that has a magic does not need to be elaborated upon, the painting alone speaks.
A work of art that is difficult to describe in words has to be seen with the eyes and a heart that is open and not influenced by the name of the painter. In this honesty, there is a purity in the connection between the viewer and the viewed.
As a through discussion of Balinese and Indonesian arts is beyond the scope of this catalogue, the reader is referred to the books listed in the bibliography. The following descriptions of painters styles are intended as a brief introduction to the paintings in the catalogue, which were selected using several criteria. Each is what Agung Rai considers to be an exceptional work by a particular artist, is a singular example of a given period, school or style, and contributes to a broader understanding of the development of Balinese and Indonesian paintng. The Pita Maha artist society was established in 1936 by Cokorda Gde Agung Sukawati, a royal patron of the arts in Ubud, and two European artists, the Dutch painter Rudolf Bonnet, and Walter Spies, a German. The society’s stated purpose was to support artists and craftsmen work in various media and style, who were encouraged to experiment with Western materials and theories of anatomy, and perspective.
The society sought to ensure high quality works from its members, and exhibitions of the finest works were held in Indonesia and abroad. The society ceased to be active after the onset of World War II. Paintings by several Pita Maha members are included in the catalogue, among them; Ida Bagus Made noted especially for his paintings of Balinese religious and mystical themes; and Anak Agung Gde Raka Turas, whose underwater seascapes have been an inspiration for many younger painters.
Painters from the village of Batuan, south of Ubud, have been known since the 1930s for their dense, immensely detailed paintings of Balinese ceremonies, daily life, and increasingly, “modern” Bali. In the past the artists used tempera paints; since the introduction of Western artists materials, watercolors and acrylics have become popular. The paintings are produced by applying many thin layers of paint to a shaded ink drawing. The palette tends to be dark, and the composition crowded, with innumerable details and a somewhat flattened perspective. Batuan painters represented in the catalogue are Ida Bagus Widja, whose paintings of Balinese scenes encompass the sacred as well as the mundane; and I Wayan Bendi whose paintings of the collision of Balinese and Western cultures abound in entertaining, sharply observed vignettes.
In the early 1960s,Arie Smit, a Dutch-born painter, began inviting he children of Penestanan, Ubud, to come and experiment with bright oil paints in his Ubud studio. The eventually developed the Young Artists style, distinguished by the used of brilliant colors, a graphic quality in which shadow and perspective play little part, and focus on scenes and activities from every day life in Bali. I Ketut Tagen is the only Young Artist in the catalogue; he explores new ways of rendering scenes of Balinese life while remaining grounded in the Young Artists strong sense of color and design.
The painters called “academic artists” from Bali and other parts of Indonesia are, in fact, a diverse group almost all of whom share the experience of having received training at Indonesian or foreign institutes of fine arts. A number of artists who come of age before Indonesian independence was declared in 1945 never had formal instruction at art academies, but studied painting on their own. Many of them eventually become instructors at Indonesian institutions. A number of younger academic artists in the catalogue studied with the older painters whose work appears here as well. In Bali the role of the art academy is relatively minor, while in Java academic paintings is more highly developed than any indigenous or traditional styles. The academic painters have mastered Western techniques, and have studied the different modern art movements in the West; their works is often influenced by surrealism, pointillism, cubism, or abstract expressionism. Painters in Indonesia are trying to establish a clear nation of what “modern Indonesian art” is, and turn to Indonesian cultural themes for subject matter. The range of styles is extensive Among the artists are Affandi, a West Javanese whose expressionistic renderings of Balinese scenes are internationally known; Dullah, a Central Javanese recognized for his realist paintings; Nyoman Gunarsa, a Balinese who creates distinctively Balinese expressionist paintings with traditional shadow puppet motifs; Made Wianta, whose abstract pointillism sets him apart from other Indonesian painters.
Since the late 1920s, Bali has attracted Western artists as short and long term residents. Most were formally trained at European academies, and their paintings reflect many Western artistic traditions. Some of these artists have played instrumental roles in the development of Balinese painting over the years, through their support and encouragement of local artist. The contributions of Rudolf Bonnet and Arie Smit have already been mentioned. Among other European artists whose particular visions of Bali continue to be admired are Willem Gerrad Hofker, whose paintings of Balinese in traditional dress are skillfully rendered studies of drapery, light and shadow; Carel Lodewijk Dake, Jr., whose moody paintings of temples capture the atmosphere of Balinese sacred spaces; and Adrien Jean Le Mayeur, known for his languid portraits of Balinese women.
Agung Rai feels that
Art is very private matter. It depends on what is displayed, and the spiritual connection between the work and the person looking at it. People have their own opinions, they may or may not agree with my perceptions.
He would like to encourage visitors to learn about Balinese and Indonesian art, ant to allow themselves to establish the “purity in the connection” that he describes. He hopes that his collection will de considered a resource to be actively studied, rather than simply passively appreciated, and that it will be enjoyed by artists, scholars, visitors, students, and schoolchildren from Indonesia as well as from abroad.
Abby C. Ruddick, Phd
“SELECTED PAINTINGS FROM THE COLLECTION OF THE AGUNG RAI FINE ART GALLERY”